What in the Hell is Wrong with David Paterson?
I'm back. I couldn't let this one go. Besides the incompetent boob who was elected President and the dilettante running for Senate, we have a governor who may actually be worse than the whoremonger who previous oozed into office in 2006.
New York is poised to enter the Cuomo years of high taxes and insane fees all over again. Soda tax, haircut tax, multiple fees. Property tax rebates are gone. We don't have to wait for Obama to kill the economy, Paterson is going to dismantle the Upstate economy all by himself.
New York is poised to enter the Cuomo years of high taxes and insane fees all over again. Soda tax, haircut tax, multiple fees. Property tax rebates are gone. We don't have to wait for Obama to kill the economy, Paterson is going to dismantle the Upstate economy all by himself.
posted by RomeHater @ 6:07 PM
6 Comments:
At December 18, 2008 10:30 PM,
Strikeslip said…
To think I was actually starting to REALLY LIKE this guy!
This blew it entirely for me. There is so much money that is still being given away for no good reason . . . like the hundreds of millions to the Utica school district for a massive building program . . . which is being replicated similarly elsewhere throughout the entire state. He could probably balance the budget by eliminating that program alone.
BTW - Glad you're still here
At December 19, 2008 8:54 AM,
Roman Hokie said…
I used to go by Roman Hokie. Anyway, I'm glad you're still here, too.
Must... leave... NY...
I'm also interested in what you think about the politician who was asked about the Senate seat (I think) and responded, "I don't DO Utica"... What a loser.
At December 19, 2008 8:55 AM,
Roman Hokie said…
Oh, failed to mention. At least we can expect his staffers to NOT be watching SNL any more. The skit mocking him was awesome. I don't care WHO you are.
At December 19, 2008 5:11 PM,
RomeHater said…
I'm disappointed with the impression because it ruined my opportunity to use my jokes
a. Is the governor BLIND to the needs of upstate?
b. Of course Paterson wants a tax on haircuts. He doesn't have to look at people's hair.
At January 09, 2009 11:29 AM,
Erica Nadal said…
Enjoyed this column in today's Daily News about the obesity tax. Why are New Yorkers being targeted for obesity when we're actually one of the healthiest states?
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/01/09/2009-01-09_hey_gov_paterson_soda_is_not_the_problem.html
At January 10, 2009 8:30 PM,
RomeHater said…
Years ago, I wrote a post about the stupidity of sin taxes. The true goal of these taxes is to feed off addicts, not to curb their behavior.
http://romenysucks.blogspot.com/2005/04/sin-tax-from-black-lung-to-black-gold.html
Think about this. Is there a "sin" to haircuts? There's an additional fee now. And some environmentalists will even tell you that shorter hair leads to less usage of water, plus the shampoos where you need to repeat your lather and rinse because your hair is longer.
Post a Comment
<< Home